CVP Interpretation Quiz
A normal CVP reading in a spontaneously breathing patient is 5-10 cmH2O. However, as stated earlier, its value is influenced not only by intravascular
volume and venous return, but also by venous tone and intrathoracic pressure,
along with right heart function and myocardial compliance. Therefore an isolated
CVP reading is of limited value. Trends in the CVP reading, and its response
to therapy such as a fluid challenge, are much more important than a single
reading.
| 1. |
Your patient is tachycardic, hypotensive and has a low urine
output and poor capillary refill. You therefore suspect he
is hypovolaemic and you insert a CVP line to aid your diagnosis
and management. The initial CVP reading is 6 cmH2O.
Which of the following statements is correct? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| 2. |
Your patient returns to the ward from the operating theatre
following major abdominal surgery. He has a Right Internal
Jugular CVP line in place. You notice that the reading is high
and that the patient is hypotensive and very short of breath.
Which of the following statements are correct? (may be
more than one) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
A, B, D. False.
This patient needs oxygen and a rapid assessment
to determine the underlying problem. It is
possible that this patient is suffering from
congestive cardiac failure and fluid overload.
However a number of other conditions can also
cause the clinical scenario of a raised CVP
reading, shortness of breath and hypotension
– eg. tension pneumothorax (possibly caused
by the CVP insertion itself!), pulmonary embolism
and cardiac tamponade.
Before you can state the diagnosis with certainty
you must take a quick history and examination
of the patient looking for evidence to back
up your diagnosis:
| Cardiac Failure |
pink frothy sputum, bi-basal crackles
on chest auscultation, peripheral oedema,
enlarged tender liver, suggestive history |
| Tension Pneumothorax |
assymetrical chest movement, decreased
air entry unilaterally, chest resonant
to percussion unilaterally, tracheal deviation |
| Pulmonary Embolus |
respiratory examination normal, haemodynamic
instability, gallop rhythm, pleuritic chest
pain, haemoptysis |
| Cardiac Tamponade |
muffled heart sounds |
C. Correct.
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Which of the following conditions will cause the CVP reading
to be inaccurate? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
A. True.
If the cotton wool is blocked
then fluid will not move in the tube to give
a correct reading .
B. False.
The CVP reading (i.e. the pressure
measured in the right atrium) will be accurate
but its interpretation may
not be, since with pure left ventricular failure
the CVP may be normal, leading the unwary to
believe that the cardiac function is normal.
In normal patients the CVP
is assumed to be a reflection of left ventricular
preload (CVP (RAP) α PCWP α LAP α LVEDP α LVEDV).
However in patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary
disease the right and left ventricles may function
independently, and in these situations the
CVP cannot accurately indicate left ventricular
filling pressures. In these cases left ventricular
preload should be estimated by measuring the
pulmonary capillary ‘wedge' pressure, using
a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), as this
is a better guide to the venous return to the
left side of the heart than CVP.
C. False.
Again the CVP reading (i.e.
the pressure measured in the right atrium)
will be accurate but its interpretation may
not be.
With TR, during ventricular
systole blood flows back into the RA through
the incompetent valve increasing RAP and therefore
increasing the CVP reading. The end result
is an increase in the size of the CVP v wave
(see notes on CVP waveform) and an increased
mean CVP value which may be misinterpreted
as fluid overload.
D. True.
The CVP should be 'zeroed' at the level of the
right atrium. When the patient is lying supine,
this is approximately level with the point at
the mid-axillary line in the 4th intercostal
space. Measurements should be taken in the same
position each time.
E. False.
Again the CVP reading (i.e. the pressure measured
in the right atrium) will be accurate but its interpretation may
not be.
With constrictive pericardial
disease the pressures within the heart chambers
will increase, resulting in an increased CVP
reading which may be interpreted as fluid overload.
F. False. The CVP will accurately measure the RAP. However
ventilation, either spontaneous or controlled,
does have a significant effect on the CVP. During
spontaneous ventilation, the pleural and pericardial
pressures will drop during inspiration resulting
in a fall in CVP reading. Conversely the CVP
reading will rise (usually be 3-5 cmH2O) during
inspiration due to positive pressure ventilation.
When taking the CVP reading we should account
for this by always taking the mean value of the
CVP wave at the end of expiration to be the CVP
value.
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Which of the following statements, regarding CVP use in
septic patients, are correct? (may be more than one) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
A, B, C. True.
In septic patients the CVP reading may be
low, normal or high depending on a number of
factors such as, cardiac output, venous return,
venous tone, the use of inotropes, right myocardial
function, myocardial compliance. As before
the trend in the CVP value in response to therapy
(often fluid resuscitation and/or inotropic
support) is a much more useful guide than a
single CVP reading.
D. True.
ARDS causes, among other problems, non-cardiogenic
pulmonary oedema with a subsequent rise in
right atrial pressure as measured by the CVP.
The unwary may therefore be wrongly led to
believe that the patient is suffering from
heart failure in this situation. However this
is one example of a diseased lung resulting
in dissociation of right and left heart function.
Placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)
and measurement of the pulmonary capillary
wedge pressure (PCWP) in these patients will
show a normal left atrial filling pressure
and is a much better guide to cardiac function
than the CVP in this situation.
E. True.
CVP lines can be a source of
infection in all patients, not just septic
ones. Different units have different policies
regarding the timing of removal of lines, in
an attempt to avoid line-related infection.
Some units will change lines regularly every
few days whether or not the lines appear inflamed;
other units will change lines only when there
is clinical evidence indicating line inflammation
or infection. In either case good aseptic technique
during insertion and subsequent care of the
line, can help prevent line infection from
developing.
|
|
| |
|
|
Interpreting the CVP waveform
When the CVP is displayed via electronic transduction, the waveform showing
how the pressure changes throughout the cardiac cycle can be clearly seen.
This can give a lot of useful information, and the presence of several disease
conditions may be confirmed by examination of the CVP waveform. The classical
CVP waveform is shown below.
a wave = atrial contraction
c wave = bulging of tricuspid valve into atrium at start of ventricular
contraction
x descent = atrium relaxes and tricuspid valve is pulled downwards
v wave = passive filling of right atrium and vena cavae when tricuspid valve
closes
y descent = tricuspid valve opens and blood flows into right ventricle
Disease patterns apparent in CVP waveform
Atrial fibrillation - no a wave
Heart block - cannon waves
(large
a waves due to atrium contracting against a closed tricuspid valve)
Nodal rhythm - cannon waves
(large
a waves due to atrium contracting against a closed tricuspid valve)
Tricuspid regurgitation- large c and v waves, loss of the x descent
Tricuspid stenosis - prominent a waves, muted y descent
How to give a fluid challenge?
To treat hypovolaemia/hypotension give repeated boluses (250-500 mls) of
intravenous fluid (eg. 0.9% saline / Ringer's lactate / gelofusine). Observe
the effect on CVP, blood pressure, pulse, urine output, capillary refill
etc. If the CVP rises following the fluid bolus wait 5 – 10 mins and then
repeat the CVP reading to see if the rise is sustained. The fluid challenges
should be repeated until the CVP shows a sustained rise and/or there is an
improvement in the other cardiovascular parameters.
In patients who are known or suspected to be at high risk of developing
congestive cardiac failure, the above technique for giving fluid challenges
should still be followed. However it is sensible in these patients to use
smaller fluid boluses (50-100 mls), and to titrate the total amount of fluid
delivered to the patient's response as described.
In situations when the CVP rises and stays up but the blood pressure and
urine output do not improve, then inotropes may be considered to support
the circulation. Any patient who may require inotropic support or who has
received two reasonable volumes of fluid challenge without improvement, should
be reviewed by an experienced doctor.